<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <title>Legal Digest</title>
    <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/feed.xml" rel="self" />
    <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law" />
    <updated>2025-10-26T14:29:32+05:30</updated>
    <author>
        <name>Shivam S</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://openvidhi.com/law</id>

    <entry>
        <title>Rectification of register of members u/s 59 of the Companies Act, 2013</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/rectification-of-register-of-members-us-59-of-the-companies-act-2013.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/rectification-of-register-of-members-us-59-of-the-companies-act-2013.html</id>
            <category term="Company Law"/>
            <category term="Companies Act 2013"/>

        <updated>2025-10-26T14:29:32+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 If the name of any person is, without sufficient cause, entered in the register of members of a company, or after having been entered in the register, is, without sufficient cause, omitted there&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Analysis of Mineral Development Ltd. v. State of Bihar</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-mineral-development-ltd-v-state-of-bihar.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-mineral-development-ltd-v-state-of-bihar.html</id>
            <category term="Principles of Natural Justice"/>
            <category term="Landmark Case"/>
            <category term="Case Summary"/>
            <category term="Case Analysis"/>
            <category term="Administrative Law"/>

        <updated>2025-10-26T14:12:53+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Case Analysis of Mineral Development Ltd. v. State of Bihar, 1959 SCC OnLine SC 49: AIR 1960 SC 468 with respect to Bias under the Principles of Natural Justice The dispute arose from the cancellation of a mica mining licence&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Summary of L Muruganantham v. State of Tamil Nadu</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-summary-of-l-muruganantham-v-state-of-tamil-nadu.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-summary-of-l-muruganantham-v-state-of-tamil-nadu.html</id>
        <media:content url="https://openvidhi.com/law/media/posts/18/L-Muruganantham-v-State-of-Tamil-Nadu-2025.jpg" medium="image" />
            <category term="Case Summary"/>
            <category term="Case Analysis"/>

        <updated>2025-08-09T19:00:08+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                        <img src="https://openvidhi.com/law/media/posts/18/L-Muruganantham-v-State-of-Tamil-Nadu-2025.jpg" alt="" />
                    Denying prisoners with disabilities essential facilities in prisons violates their fundamental rights Respondent 2 Police officer, Respondent 3 Central Prison, Coimbatore Coram: J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ. Judgment delivered by R. Mahadevan, J. Decided On: July 15, 2025 Citation:&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Gig Workers in India: Bridging Legal Gaps and Ensuring Sustainability</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/gig-workers-in-india-bridging-legal-gaps-and-ensuring-sustainability.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/gig-workers-in-india-bridging-legal-gaps-and-ensuring-sustainability.html</id>
            <category term="Social Security"/>
            <category term="Labour Law"/>

        <updated>2025-09-28T16:01:40+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Read the full article NLIU Law Review: Volume XIV Issue II (June 2025), https://nliulawreview.nliu.ac.in/journal-archives/ OR directly at https://nliulawreview.nliu.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/NLR_Volume_XIV_Issue_2-155-179.pdf (2025) 1 NLIU L. Rev. 154 India is the fifth largest gig economy in the world and is bound to be the&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Invasive Species in Indian Forest</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/invasive-species-in-indian-forest.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/invasive-species-in-indian-forest.html</id>
            <category term="Wildlife Protection Act"/>
            <category term="Invasive Species"/>
            <category term="Environmental Law"/>
            <category term="Biodiversity Act"/>

        <updated>2025-10-26T14:13:04+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Introduction Invasive species are non-native organisms that cause harm to the environment, economy, or human health. They outcompete native species for resources, leading to ecological imbalance. Global Context: A leading cause of biodiversity loss worldwide. Affect ecosystems, economies, and human&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Are Animals Legal Persons, Property or Tool? A Jurisprudential Analysis</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/are-animals-legal-persons-property-or-tool-a-jurisprudential-analysis.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/are-animals-legal-persons-property-or-tool-a-jurisprudential-analysis.html</id>
        <media:content url="https://openvidhi.com/law/media/posts/13/how-different-countries-view-animals.jpg" medium="image" />
            <category term="Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act"/>
            <category term="Premium Content"/>
            <category term="Legal Personality"/>
            <category term="Jurisprudence"/>
            <category term="Case Summary"/>

        <updated>2025-10-26T14:12:49+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                        <img src="https://openvidhi.com/law/media/posts/13/how-different-countries-view-animals.jpg" alt="" />
                    Abstract The legal status of animals has long been a subject of debate in jurisprudence. Traditionally, animals have been classified as property or tools for human use, with laws primarily focusing on regulating their treatment rather than recognizing them as&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Analysis of Regina v. Mark Royle 2013 EWCA Crim 1461</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-regina-v-mark-royle-2013-ewca-crim-1461.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-regina-v-mark-royle-2013-ewca-crim-1461.html</id>
            <category term="Principles of Criminal Law"/>
            <category term="Case Summary"/>
            <category term="Case Analysis"/>

        <updated>2025-04-23T11:58:00+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Regina v. Mark Royle [2013] EWCA Crim 1461 The case involves the appellant, who was accused of robbing and causing the death of Mrs. Geraghty, a 79 year old woman. The appellant was reportedly addicted to hard drugs and was&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Social Learning Theory under Criminal Law</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/social-learning-theory-under-criminal-law.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/social-learning-theory-under-criminal-law.html</id>
            <category term="Principles of Criminal Law"/>
            <category term="Criminology"/>

        <updated>2025-04-23T11:52:49+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Social Learning Theory [1] Social Learning Theory in Criminology is given by Ronald L Akers, along with Robert Burgess. It builds upon the broad psychological theory of same name by Albert Bandura. Akers has used Bandura’s theory in context of&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) Dispute under International Law</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/grand-ethiopian-renaissance-dam-gerd-dispute-under-international-law.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/grand-ethiopian-renaissance-dam-gerd-dispute-under-international-law.html</id>
            <category term="Public International Law"/>
            <category term="International Dispute"/>

        <updated>2025-04-23T11:45:04+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam [1] GERD is being constructed near Sudan border region in Ethiopia. It is expected to have a capacity of 74 billion cubic meters of water, which makes it the largest hydroelectric power project in Africa. This&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Summary of Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar v. Moreshwar Madan Mantri</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-summary-of-gajanan-moreshwar-parelkar-v-moreshwar-madan-mantri.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-summary-of-gajanan-moreshwar-parelkar-v-moreshwar-madan-mantri.html</id>
            <category term="Landmark Case"/>
            <category term="Contract Law"/>
            <category term="Case Summary"/>

        <updated>2025-02-09T00:04:32+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    This case[1] deals with s. 124 and 125 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, concerning indemnity. The Plaintiff, Gajanan Moreshwar got a plot of land on lease from BMC, Mumbai and then allowed the defendant to erect a building on the&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Analysis of Kasturi Lal v. State of U.P., 1964</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-kasturi-lal-v-state-of-up-1964.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-kasturi-lal-v-state-of-up-1964.html</id>
            <category term="Contract Law"/>
            <category term="Case Analysis"/>

        <updated>2025-02-09T00:06:53+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Kasturi Lal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U.P.[1] Facts There was a firm named M/s. Kasturi Lal and Ralia Ram. Ralia Ram was one of its partners. On the 20th September, 1947 Ralia Ram arrived at Meerut by the&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Analysis of Adams v. Naylor</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-adams-v-naylor.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-adams-v-naylor.html</id>
            <category term="Contract Law"/>
            <category term="Case Analysis"/>

        <updated>2025-02-09T00:06:33+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Adams v Naylor[1] Facts In August 1942, three boys, Robert Adams (12), Charles Adams (13), and Frank Smith (13), were playing on sandhills near Crosby and Southport along the Lancashire coast. The area had been made into a minefield by&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Analysis of P &amp; O Steam Navigation Company v. Secretary of State, 1868</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-p-and-o-steam-navigation-company-v-secretary-of-state-1868.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-p-and-o-steam-navigation-company-v-secretary-of-state-1868.html</id>
            <category term="Contract Law"/>
            <category term="Case Analysis"/>

        <updated>2025-02-09T00:06:46+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company v. The Secretary of State for India[1] Facts One day a servant of the plaintiff company was driving a horse carriage during his employment with the EIC. There was a government dockyard based at&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Legal Maxim Rex non potest peccare : The King can do no wrong</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/legal-maxim-rex-non-potest-peccare-the-king-can-do-no-wrong.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/legal-maxim-rex-non-potest-peccare-the-king-can-do-no-wrong.html</id>
            <category term="Legal Maxim"/>

        <updated>2025-02-08T12:46:09+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Introduction Rex Non Potest Peccare is a fundamental principle of English laws, as said by Blackstone who described King as being perfect without capacity and ability to do wrong and is created for the benefit of the people, and therefore&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Analysis of Loop Telecom and Trading Ltd. v. UOI, 2022</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-loop-telecom-and-trading-ltd-v-uoi-2022.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-loop-telecom-and-trading-ltd-v-uoi-2022.html</id>
            <category term="Case Analysis"/>

        <updated>2024-11-05T17:24:41+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Loop Telecom &amp; Trading Ltd. v. Union of India, (2022) 6 SCC 762[1] In Loop Telecom and Trading Limited v Union of India and Another, the Supreme Court denied the Appellant restitution of amount it paid, under a void agreement.
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Case Analysis of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) LD., 1953</title>
        <author>
            <name>Shivam S</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-pharmaceutical-society-of-great-britain-v-boots-cash-chemists-southern-ld-1953.html"/>
        <id>https://openvidhi.com/law/case-analysis-of-pharmaceutical-society-of-great-britain-v-boots-cash-chemists-southern-ld-1953.html</id>
            <category term="Contract Law"/>
            <category term="Case Analysis"/>

        <updated>2025-02-09T00:06:26+05:30</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    Pharmaceutical Society v Boots[1] The case of Pharmaceutical Society v Boots is a UK contract law case, concerning the difference between invitation to offer and offer. The case also dealt with the time of formation of contract. In this case,&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content></content>
    </entry>
</feed>
